Russia has escalated its campaign against Telegram by targeting the messaging service’s founder, Pavel Durov, with an international arrest warrant, accusing the platform of allowing its communications infrastructure to be used for terrorism, sabotage and other crimes.
The Federal Security Service, or FSB, said Wednesday that it had charged Durov, 41, with facilitating terrorist activity and accused Telegram of failing to remove material that Russian authorities say has been used by Ukrainian intelligence services and organizations Moscow considers terrorist or extremist. The move adds a personal dimension to the Kremlin’s increasingly aggressive effort to bring one of Russia’s most widely used communications platforms under tighter state control.
The FSB said Telegram had been used to prepare and coordinate sabotage, terrorist attacks, mass killings and cyber fraud. It also cited a case involving a dating chat that allegedly became a recruitment channel for Ukrainian special services, which Russian authorities said was used to persuade Russians to participate in acts of sabotage and terrorism.
According to the FSB, authorities detained 46 people across Russia in connection with the alleged recruitment operation, including minors. The agency said those recruited through Telegram had carried out attacks against law enforcement officers and set fires at transportation, energy, communications and financial facilities.
The accusations represent the latest confrontation between Durov and governments seeking greater control over Telegram. The service has become a particularly contentious platform because the same characteristics that have made it indispensable to dissidents, journalists and ordinary users seeking information outside official channels have also allowed criminal networks, extremist groups and purveyors of disinformation to operate with relative freedom.
For Moscow, the stakes are especially high. Telegram has become deeply embedded in Russian society since the Kremlin sharply expanded its control over traditional media and restricted access to major Western internet services following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
With independent media outlets forced to close, blocked or operate from outside Russia, Telegram emerged as one of the few places where Russians could still find a broad range of information. News organizations use the platform to distribute reporting, while individuals rely on it for neighborhood discussions, private conversations and updates that may not appear on state-controlled television or other government-approved outlets.
That dependence has made Telegram difficult for the Kremlin to eliminate outright.
Russia began restricting the platform last year while promoting MAX, a state-backed messaging service as an alternative. Authorities also moved to make it harder for users to circumvent restrictions by limiting access to virtual private networks, or VPNs, that can be used to bypass government internet controls.
Yet Telegram remains widely used in Russia. Durov said in April that about 65 million Russians were still using the platform every day, while Telegram says its global user base exceeds 1 billion people.
The service has also become an important communications channel for military personnel on both sides of the Russia-Ukraine war, further increasing its strategic importance and the Kremlin’s concerns about its lack of direct control over the platform.
The timing of Wednesday’s announcement has raised questions about competing views inside the Russian government over how aggressively Moscow should move against Telegram.
Only days earlier, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told the Russian news agency Interfax that Russian authorities had been communicating with Telegram’s leadership about potentially lifting restrictions on the platform. The apparent shift from discussions about easing restrictions to an international warrant for Durov has prompted speculation among Russian political analysts that different factions are pursuing competing approaches to the service.
Ilya Grashchenkov, a Moscow-based political analyst, described the situation as another stage in a continuing struggle over Telegram rather than necessarily a final decision on the platform’s future in Russia.
Anastasia Kashevarova, a prominent Russian military blogger, similarly pointed to what she described as a lack of coordination among competing political factions. She said the rapid change in official messaging could further undermine public confidence in statements from Russian politicians and officials.
The tensions surrounding Telegram have political consequences beyond internet policy. Restrictions on the platform last year coincided with a decline in President Vladimir Putin’s approval rating to levels not seen since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, according to the material provided for this report. The dispute also exposed unusual disagreements inside the Russian political establishment.
In one rare public confrontation in the State Duma, pro-Kremlin lawmaker Sergei Mironov criticized officials responsible for blocking Telegram, calling them “idiots” and “scoundrels.”
Telegram’s significance in Russia is rooted partly in the personal history of its founder.
Durov was born in St. Petersburg and became one of Russia’s earliest major internet entrepreneurs after co-founding Vkontakte, a social networking platform often compared with Facebook. He launched the company at 21 and became a prominent figure in Russia’s technology sector at a time when the country’s internet remained considerably less restricted.
His relationship with the Russian authorities deteriorated as Vkontakte grew. Durov has said that he refused government demands to provide information about users who were using the platform to organize political protests. He subsequently lost control of the company and left Russia, with Vkontakte eventually coming under the ownership of a company aligned with the Kremlin.
The experience helped shape the philosophy behind Telegram, which Durov founded in 2013 with his brother, Nikolai. The service was built around the principle that communication should remain resistant to government censorship and outside interference.
Durov has since presented Telegram as a largely stateless organization, operating independently of governments and emphasizing freedom of communication. That position has helped the service attract activists, journalists and privacy-conscious users in authoritarian states.
But the same structure has repeatedly put Telegram at odds with governments around the world.
The platform has faced pressure not only in Russia and other authoritarian countries such as Iran but also in democratic nations seeking stronger cooperation from the company in criminal investigations and content moderation. Governments have increasingly demanded that Telegram respond to illegal activity conducted through its infrastructure, while Durov has maintained that excessive government intervention threatens internet freedom.
His resistance has also brought direct legal consequences.
French authorities arrested Durov in 2024 after he arrived in the country and later charged him with facilitating criminal activity through Telegram. He was held for four days before being released under judicial restrictions and ordered to remain in France. The travel restriction was subsequently lifted.
Durov rejected the characterization of Telegram as an unregulated haven for criminal activity, arguing at the time that descriptions of the service as an anarchic platform were false.
The latest Russian case is nevertheless likely to create additional complications for Durov, who holds French and Emirati citizenship and is permanently based in Dubai. An international arrest warrant does not necessarily mean he will be detained in the United Arab Emirates, but it could substantially narrow his ability to travel internationally without facing the possibility of arrest.
Durov did not issue a direct public response to the FSB’s allegations. Soon after the announcement, however, Telegram’s account on X posted an older photograph of Durov raising his middle finger, a gesture that appeared to underscore his longstanding defiance of government pressure.
The Kremlin’s campaign against Telegram is also part of a broader transformation of Russia’s information environment.
Since the invasion of Ukraine, Russian authorities have eliminated or restricted much of the independent media landscape, while access to major international platforms including YouTube, Facebook and Instagram has been curtailed. State television and other Kremlin-controlled outlets have consequently gained greater influence over mainstream news.
Telegram has filled part of the space left behind.
Unlike traditional media, it allows users to select individual channels and communicate directly through chats without relying on centralized editorial decisions or the recommendation systems of large social media companies. Russian users have built communities around everything from local neighborhood issues to military developments and political commentary.
That makes the platform both a source of information and a potential source of political risk for the Kremlin.
Telegram has also become an important tool for Russian military bloggers, whose channels can attract large audiences and offer immediate accounts of battlefield developments. Military personnel and supporters have used the service to discuss the war, while Ukrainian officials and military communities use it as well.
The platform’s dual role — as a channel for uncensored information and as a venue for criminal activity — has placed Durov at the center of a global debate over how governments should regulate communications technology without turning censorship into a tool of political control.
For Russia, that debate has become increasingly difficult to separate from the question of sovereignty over the internet.
The government’s promotion of MAX alongside restrictions on Telegram indicates that Moscow wants Russians to have access to digital communications through platforms that are more responsive to state demands. Telegram’s continued popularity suggests that users have not entirely accepted that shift.
The FSB’s decision to pursue Durov internationally raises the pressure further. Rather than simply restricting Telegram’s operations inside Russia, authorities have now framed its founder as a criminal suspect accused of enabling terrorism and other serious offenses.
The move could give the Kremlin additional leverage over Telegram, but it also risks reinforcing the very perception of Durov that has helped make him a symbol of resistance to government control of the internet.
For years, Durov’s central proposition has been that communications platforms should not belong to governments. Russia’s latest action demonstrates how difficult it has become for Telegram to maintain that position while operating inside an increasingly controlled information environment.
The confrontation is therefore about more than one messaging app. It reflects a broader struggle over who controls the channels through which people communicate, receive news and organize communities — and whether governments can impose their authority on digital networks that were designed to operate beyond their reach.
More in World coverage
- Kyiv is moving beyond broad attacks on refineries and oil depots, using technical intelligence to target components that are difficult to replace and keep Russia’s energy system disrupted for longer.
- Ukraine says Russia launched more than 700 aerial weapons in one of the largest overnight assaults of the war, striking Kyiv and several regional centers while Moscow claims it targeted military infrastructure.
- Moscow expands ballistic missile campaign against Ukraine while Kyiv struggles with depleted Patriot interceptor supplies and stalled US-led peace negotiations.
- Zelenskiy says Ukrainian forces thwarted March offensive, liberating territory as fighting continues across 1,200 km of the front.
- How Moscow is balancing outrage, restraint and strategic calculation as the Middle East war reshapes global power.
