North Korea condemns Israel’s attack on Iran backed by the United States

Pyongyang calls Israel’s attack on Iran illegal aggression and warns US-backed strikes could destabilize global order.

People watch a TV news broadcast showing Kim Jong Un at a railway station in Seoul.
People watch a television screen showing a news broadcast featuring Kim Jong Un attending the 9th Congress of the Workers’ Party of Korea at a railway station in Seoul on February 26, 2026. Photo by Jung Yeon-je/AFP/Getty Images

North Korea has condemned Israel’s attack on Iran, carried out with the backing of the United States, describing the military operation as a flagrant violation of sovereignty and a dangerous escalation that threatens global peace and stability.

In a sharply worded statement published late Sunday by state media, Pyongyang accused Washington and Tel Aviv of acting outside international law and warned that unchecked military force would have repercussions far beyond the Middle East.

According to Korean Central News Agency, a spokesperson for North Korea’s Foreign Ministry said Israel’s attack on Iran represented “the most despicable form of aggression” and a blatant disregard for international norms.

“The sovereignty of an independent state has been openly violated,” the spokesperson said, adding that the strikes were a predictable outcome of what Pyongyang described as the United States’ “hegemonic and rogue behavior” on the world stage.

The statement accused Washington of placing itself above international law, abusing its military power to pursue strategic interests while destabilizing entire regions in the process.

North Korea made clear that its condemnation was directed not only at Israel, but also at the United States, which it said provided political backing and military support for the strikes.

Donald Trump has defended Israel’s attack on Iran, arguing that military action became unavoidable after Tehran refused to renounce nuclear weapons ambitions. Iran, however, has repeatedly denied seeking nuclear arms, insisting its nuclear program remains peaceful.

For Pyongyang, the episode reinforces long-held claims that Washington selectively applies international law, tolerating military force by allies while condemning similar actions by adversaries.

In unusually direct language, North Korea warned that Israel’s attack on Iran could trigger consequences well beyond the Middle East.

Unchecked military action, the Foreign Ministry spokesperson said, risks destabilizing global political and economic systems and could create a chain reaction of conflict across multiple regions.

Analysts say the warning reflects Pyongyang’s belief that major powers are increasingly willing to use force without regard for long-term consequences.

“North Korea is framing this as a systemic problem,” said a regional security analyst in Seoul. “The message is that if military power becomes the main tool of diplomacy, no country can feel safe.”

The statement comes as South Korea’s new leadership is attempting to re-engage Pyongyang after years of strained relations.

Lee Jae-myung has urged North Korea to return to talks with Washington and help shape what he described as a “new future” for the Korean Peninsula.

However, North Korea’s condemnation of Israel’s attack on Iran highlights the depth of mistrust toward the United States, raising questions about how receptive Pyongyang may be to renewed diplomacy.

Despite rising tensions, Trump has reiterated that he remains open to talks with Kim Jong Un without preconditions, according to media reports in South Korea and Japan.

Kim, meanwhile, has suggested that improved relations with Washington are possible only if the US recognizes North Korea as a nuclear power — a position Washington has consistently rejected.

The impasse reflects the collapse of earlier diplomacy, when high-profile summits between Trump and Kim failed to produce a lasting agreement on denuclearization.

Israel’s attack on Iran appears to reinforce Pyongyang’s long-standing argument that military strength, not diplomacy alone, guarantees national survival.

North Korean officials have frequently cited the fate of countries such as Iraq and Libya — both of which abandoned weapons programs before later facing foreign intervention — as cautionary examples.

From Pyongyang’s perspective, Iran’s experience sends a stark message: negotiations do not necessarily shield a country from attack.

Growing alignment with Russia

North Korea’s criticism of Israel’s attack on Iran also aligns closely with Russia’s position on Western military intervention.

Kim has strengthened ties with Vladimir Putin, sending troops and munitions to support Moscow’s war in Ukraine. The partnership has deepened North Korea’s integration into an emerging bloc of states openly challenging US global influence.

Analysts say the alignment underscores how conflicts in the Middle East are increasingly interconnected with rivalries in Europe and Asia.

Beyond foreign policy, the statement also serves a domestic purpose for Pyongyang. By condemning Israel’s attack on Iran, North Korea reinforces its narrative that external threats justify its own heavy investment in military and nuclear capabilities.

State media portrayed the strikes as further evidence that international law offers little protection against powerful adversaries, strengthening the regime’s argument that self-reliance in defense is essential.

While South Korea and other regional actors continue to call for dialogue, North Korea’s reaction suggests it remains deeply skeptical of US intentions.

As long as military force remains a prominent tool of policy, Pyongyang appears unlikely to make concessions that it believes could weaken its security posture.

As Israel’s attack on Iran reverberates across regions, North Korea’s response highlights how wars in one part of the world can reshape diplomatic calculations elsewhere.

From Pyongyang’s perspective, the strikes confirm a deeply held belief: that power, not promises, ultimately shapes international relations — and that smaller states must be prepared for a world where military force increasingly trumps diplomacy.

Related

Leave a Reply

Popular